Adventures with SONY Digital Paper Constructive criticism I maintain this list because the SONY DPS has quite literally changed the way I work for the better, and I have become fully committed to helping SONY produce the best possible second version of this device. https://www.phys.hawaii.edu/~kcroker/sonydps/#wishlist
I’m remembering what it felt like to spend so much time on teaching because I’ve been inundated the past two weeks by new faculty who are frustrated about how much time, energy and effort they are spending on teaching and service and how little is “left over” for research and writing. (The Teaching Trap. Armando Bengochea March 15, 2010)
Teaching Trapの定義：
The trap is when new tenure-track faculty spend the vast majority of their time on teaching at the expense of their research and writing and then find that their limited research productivity endangers their ability to be promoted at their current institution, or move to another one. (The Teaching Trap. Armando Bengochea March 15, 2010)
Concentrate on your research. If your research is good, no one will care if you can teach. After all, when was the last time someone got tenure for being a good teacher? (Academic Scientists at Work: To Teach or Not to Teach? By Jeremy M. Boss, Susan H. EckertMay. 9, 2003 , 8:00 AM sciencemag.org)
Put research and publishing ahead of the needs of your students. You can be a good teacher after you get tenure.
Once you have established your classes, do not reinvent the wheel every
semester. Make small tweaks to improve classes, do not overhaul unless directed to from the outside. (Getting Started on the Tenure Track: Challenges and Strategies for Success Article in Schole · January 2019 DOI: 10.1080/1937156X.2019.1589804)
参考
Tribal, proletarian and entrepreneurial career stories: junior academics as a case in point November 2015Studies in Higher Education 42(7):1-17 DOI:10.1080/03075079.2015.1092129 Authors: Oili-Helena Ylijoki Lea Henriksson 無料要旨 Drawing upon a narrative approach, five career stories are constructed: the Novice of the Academic Elite, the Victim of the Teaching Trap, the Academic Worker, the Research Group Member and the Academic Freelancer.
Fig. 5. Serous carcinoma, transitional cell carcinoma-like pattern. Ovarian tumors: a survey of selected advances of note during the life of this journal Author links open overlay panelRobert H.YoungMD, FRCPath Human Pathology Volume 95, January 2020, Pages 169-206
別の、American Journal of Clinical Pathology (AJCP) という雑誌（インパクトファクター＝2.094）も見てみます。
Representative pulmonary photomicrographs. A, Low-power magnification of right lower lobe showing focal emphysema. B, Low-power magnification of left lower lobe showing emphysema occupied by mononuclear cells. C, High-power magnification of right lower lobe highlighting focal emphysema and near absence of mononuclear cells within alveoli. D, High-power magnification of left lower lobe showing alveolar spaces occupied by lymphohistiocytic and neutrophilic infiltrates that involved but did not expand alveoli. Positive Postmortem Test for SARS-CoV-2 Following Embalming in Confirmed COVID-19 Autopsy. American Journal of Clinical Pathology, aqaa220, https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/aqaa220 Published: 24 October 2020
With our #DNA-PAINT Christmas tree, approximately 25 million times smaller than its real-world counter-part, we wish Season‘s Greetings and Happy New Year. pic.twitter.com/BUdEYQd7as
— Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry (MPIB) (@MPI_Biochem) December 22, 2017
— Dr. Christian Lamberz (@Christi23003438) March 11, 2019
スケールバー：500 nm
Complexity at scale. Platinum replica EM of HeLa cell inner plasma membrane. Clathrin, caveolae, actin filaments, microtubules, vesicles, membrane proteins…. Scale bar is 500 nm. pic.twitter.com/kaRZGQW5r6
That’s a pretty good image of Jupiter, but I’ll stick with cells . My scale bar is 10 microns, where is yours?
DNA=red, Golgi=yellow, Centrosome=blue pic.twitter.com/rsmhebtwH0
Ｑ２７：国際会議等の参加登録費には、以下のものが含まれている場合、どのようにすればよいでしょうか？
① モーニングセミナー等
② ランチョンセミナー等
③ イブニングセミナー等
④ ウェルカムレセプション等
Ａ ：参加登録費の内訳が公式に確認できる場合（主催者のパンフレット等に内訳が明記されている場合など）は記載された①～④の金額を差引き、確認ができない場合は、回数に応じて日当の半額を差し引きます。ただし、不参加の場合には差引くことはありません。（秋田大学）
People labelled as bullies rarely self-identify in the role, believing their behaviour to be perfectly acceptable. (White coat bullies. Roger Collier. CMAJ August 05, 2014 186 (11) 820) （訳：当サイト）
A bad supervisor can perpetuate a wide range of aggressive behaviors over time with the only goal of humiliating and frightening the target. An abusive supervisor ignores the victim’s views and opinion. An example is when a PI doesn’t listen to the opinions of a certain lab member or doesn’t allow that person to speak at all during lab meetings. To block the victim’s career, the bully supervisor can decide to change the victim’s project for no obvious reason. For instance, a trainee proposes new ideas for his/her project, but the PI doesn’t allow him/her to perform any experiments that can improve the project. (Bullying in science: let’s face the problem By Margherita Perillo ascb.org March 16, 2018)
You can have supervisors who are brilliant in their work as scientists but who don’t necessarily have people skills. (イジメ行為を働くボスたち Bosses Who Bully By Irene S. Levine Science Careers Sep. 22, 2006, 8:00 AM)（訳：当サイト）
なぜスーパーバイザーが一部の人間をいじめの標的にするのか little is still known as to why certain individuals are picked by supervisors as targets for abuse (Taking it out on survivors: Submissive employees, downsizing, and abusive supervision. Pedro Neves. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology First published: 08 April 2014)（訳：当サイト）
自己評価が低く仲間からのサポートも少ない人ほどスーパーバイザーから攻撃されやすい。Employees with poor core-self evaluations (an aggregate measure related to self-esteem and sense of control) and poor coworker support were more likely to experience aggressive behavior from their supervisor (belittling, blaming, etc.). (End Abusive Behavior on Your Team Liane Davey, Harvard Business Review JULY 18, 2014)（訳：当サイト）
Several of my lab mates are bullied by our supervisor. I use this term because the people affected tend to be the ones with less confidence, who don’t answer back and don’t stand up for themselves. Other people (including me) have a good relationship with this supervisor so this issue doesn’t affect everyone. (Bullying supervisors – what really is the best strategy to deal with it? PhD Discussion Forum 19 May 2014 20:51)
Last year after five years of working together, my former supervisor decided he had in fact just realized I was incapable of scientific research, and should not get a PhD, so goodbye. (I am obviously summarizing rapidly a project that wasn’t working, and his lack of supervision which became pretty abusive.) He was department head so there was little to be done, and the board supposed to supervise my PhD’s official advice was “we can’t tell you what to do, so think about what makes you happy,” and then get pissed when I said what made me happy was being treated fairly and finishing my PhD. (My former supervisor was a bully reddit.com)（抄訳：当サイト）
‘I became convinced I was going mad’ – your experiences of workplace bullying (The Guardian Guardian readers and Charlotte Seager. Sat 1 Apr 2017 07.00 BST)
Why Do Bully Bosses Bully Their Stars – And Redheads? It’s more about the bully than the star, as columnist Richard Cohen explains. (By RICHARD B. COHEN. AOBVE THE LAW Mar 16, 2017 at 5:57 PM)
Culture of cruelty: why bullying thrives in higher education (Sam Farley and Christine Sprigg, The Guardian Mon 3 Nov 2014 15.30 GMT)
出会いのパターンは大きく分けてこの二つ。 ① 大学時代に出会う。この場合、相手は同じ学問分野（同学科の同級生）、同趣味（サークルで出会う）、あるいは別学部や別学部（教養科目や友人を介して）だと考えられる。 ② 研究室で出会う。相手は同じ分野の研究者。あるいは研究補助員・テクニカルスタッフ・秘書。(研究者同士の結婚について。 aprilone78 2010-09-06 )
未婚状態から結婚状態への移行を検討する際、交際へ移行する過程と交際から結婚へ移行する過程では意思決定に影響を及ぼす要因が異なることが明らかになりつつある。（結婚の意思決定に関する分析～「結婚の意思決定に関する意識調査」の個票を用いて～ 佐藤博樹、三輪哲、高見具広、高村静、石田絢子 September 2016 内閣府 ESRI Discussion Paper Series No.332 PDF）
結婚前に分かる「長続きしない結婚の8つの兆候」(Amanda Scherker The Huffington Post 2015年01月13日 19時26分 JST) １．はじめから金銭感覚が合わなかった。カンザス州立大学が行なった研究は、新婚旅行の最中にお金のことでケンカになってしまったら、末永く幸せには暮らせそうにない、と示している。研究者らは、関係の初期段階における金銭絡みのケンカと、将来の結婚生活における不満には相関性がみられるとし、お金は「離婚を予測する最大の判断材料」であるとしている。興味深いことに、この相関性は、収入レベルや裕福度を問わず見られるという。
私：「来週のラボミーティングは自分の番なんですが、データがないんですけど。」
ボス：「それはあなたの問題ね。」
Me: “I’m supposed to present at lab meeting next week, but I have no data.”
Advisor: “That’s your problem.” @sianbehr 14:48 – 2014年2月21日
大学院で最初のラボミーティングだけどデータが無いから休日の写真を1時間見せていよう First lab meeting presentation today as a PhD, no data, just going to show my holiday photos for an hour @Sarah_Bethy_ 0:22 – 2016年2月26日
1. 失敗の過程を話して、ラボからの助言を仰ぐ
2.古いデータを見直してみる 定量的な解析を行うことにより、新しい見方ができるかも
3．解析ソフトウェアを使いこなす バイオインフォマティクスツールなどの利用で新しい発見があるかも
（4.論文紹介の時間にする）
5. 新しいモデル、模式図をつくってみる 手持ちのデータや文献からの知見をあわせて新たなモデルがつくれるかも
6．備えあれば憂いなし 日頃からサ イドプロジェクトを走らせておいて、何もニューデータがないという状態をつくらないようにする （How to present during lab meeting without new data May 25, 2017 BY Brittany Carson）
“I have not failed 10,000 times. I have not failed once. I have succeeded in proving that those 10,000 ways will not work. When I have eliminated the ways that will not work, I will find the way that will work.” (Thomas Edison) (How Failure Taught Edison to Repeatedly Innovate. By Nathan Furr, forbes.com Jun 9, 2011)
こんせぷちゅあるあどばんす【conceptual advance】研究成果が、既成の概念の変更を迫るくらいに革新的であること。トップジャーナルには必須とされ、これがないとリジェクトされる理由になる。「コンセプチュアル・アドバンスがないと、ネイチャーなんて通りっこないよ。」”The paper does not provide the conceptualadvance needed for publication in Science.” “Manuscripts may be rejected because they represent a relatively small conceptualadvance on our present state of knowledge.” “A referee has raised major conceptual concerns about the advance your findings represent.”
すべてはつながってくる【全ては繋がってくる】①世の中における真理の一つ。“You can’t connect the dots looking forward; you can only connect them looking backwards. So you have to trust that the dots will somehow connect in your future.” (Steve Jobs) ②ラボのメインの仕事ではない研究テーマや、メインストーリーから外れる実験を学生に無理強いするときにボスが使う言葉。「全ては繋がって来るんだよ！」「‥」
I am/We are pleased【be pleased】 ”喜んで‥” 論文投稿後にエディターから送られて来るdecisionメールを読み始めた研究者が、一番期待して探し求める言葉。論文が受理されたことを伝えるときに必ず含まれている語句。”I am pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been accepted for publication in XXXX (ジャーナル名). ” “We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript ‘XXXXXX（論文タイトル）’ has been provisionally accepted for publication in XXXX (ジャーナル名).”
プロナス【Proceedings of the National Academy of Science】中堅どころの学術誌のひとつ。 ピーエヌエーエス（PNAS）とも呼ばれる。ピーナスと呼ぶ日本人も結構な数いるが、penis(ペニス）の英語の発音と同じに聞こえるため、控えたほうがいいと個人的には思う。
I/We regret 【regret】 ”残念ながら‥” 論文投稿後にエディターから送られて来るdecisionメールの中で、研究者が一番目にしたくない言葉。悪い知らせを伝える文に必ず含まれている語句 “I regret to inform you thatwe cannot publish your manuscript in XXXX (ジャーナル名).” “I regretthatwe are unable to publish it in XXXX (ジャーナル名).” “Weregret to say thatwe will not be able to accept this manuscript for publication in XXXX (ジャーナル名)”
クレジット【credit】「科学者の研究への貢献を認めることをクレジット(credit)といいます。」（科学の健全な発展のために －誠実な科学者の心得ー 日本学術振興会 PDF14ページ). Caudri et al., Doing science: how to get credit for your scientific work. Breathe (Sheff). 2015 Jun; 11(2): 153–155. (PubMed)
都司さんは甲子園球場の近くの小学校に通っている頃は、常に1番の成績だった。灘中（神戸市）に進学すると、1学年150人ほどのうち、130番前後になった。「はじめて強烈な劣等感を持ちました。私の学力ではかなわない生徒ばかりだったのです」(“灘中→麻布高校→東大”で、抱き続けた劣等感 PRESIDENT Online 2016.1.5)
晴れて入学したその有名進学校で、しかし、私は大きな挫折を味わいます。数学オリンピックの金メダリスト・高校生クイズで優勝した人・両親が東大理科三類出身で異常に頭が切れるイケメン・東大病院の教授の子供……有名進学校は枚挙にいとまがないほどの天才集団でした。「地元じゃ負け知らず」の私も、そんな天才たちの前にはただの凡人。（競争社会を勝ち抜き続けてきた東大生の「将来やりたいことがない」という葛藤に満ちた就職活動 2018年9月20日(木) ONE CAREER）
When you’ve lived all the time as number one or number two (or even possibly number three) in high school science, and when you know that everybody who’s below average in the science courses where you came from is a complete idiot, and now you suddenly discover that you are below average – and half of you guys are – it’s a terrible blow, because you imagine that it means you’re as dumb as those guys used to be in high school, relatively. (The Quotable Feynman)
But there is also a certain disadvantage: because Caltech has such a good reputation, almost everybody who’s the first or second in his high school class applies here. There are lots of high schools, and all the very best men apply. Now, we have tried to figure out a system of selection,
with all kinds of tests, so that we get the best of the best. And so you guys have been very carefully picked out from all these schools to come here. But we’ re still working on it, because we’ve found a very serious problem: no matter how carefully we select the men, no matter how patiently we make the analysis, when they get here something happens: it always turns out that approximately half of them are below average!
Of course you laugh at this because it’s self-evident to the rational mind, but not to the emotional mind – the emotional mind can’t laugh at this. When you’ve lived all the time as number one or number two (or even possibly number three) in high school science, and when you know that everybody who’s below average in the science courses where you came from is a complete idiot, and now you suddenly discover that you are below average – and half of you guys are – it’s a terrible blow, because you imagine that it means you’re as dumb as those guys used to be in high school, relatively. That’s the great disadvantage of Caltech: that this psychological blow is so difficult to take. Of course, I’m not a psychologist; I’m imagining all this. I don’t know how it would really be, of course!
The question is what to do if you find you’re below average. There are two possibilities. (Feynman’s Tips on Physics: Reflections, Advice, Insights, Practice)
